ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2025
Prognostic Value of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) Profiles in Predicting Outcomes of Occipital Nerve Stimulation for Refractory Chronic Migraine: A Retrospective Bias-Corrected Multivariable Analysis.
Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors of Treatment Success Following Pulsed Radiofrequency of the Lumbar Dorsal Root Ganglion: A Multivariable Prediction Model with Clinical Nomogram.Current pain and headache reports · 2026Review
- Study on the Analgesic Mechanism of Aloperine in Mice with Neuropathic Pain Based on the p38MAPK/FKN/CX3CR1 Pathway.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-guided continuous radiofrequency of the C2 dorsal root ganglion for menstrually related migraine: a comparative clinical study.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Observational
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Scribing for Chronic Pain Care: A Narrative Review.Current pain and headache reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRefractory chronic migraine (rCM) is characterized by debilitating headaches that do not respond adequately to conventional medical treatments, leaving patients severely disabled. In these rare cases, central cervical spinal cord stimulation or occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) may offer a potential therapeutic option. However, these techniques are not without risks, lack clear scientific evidence, and impose a significant economic burden. Therefore, it is crucial to identify parameters that can assist physicians in selecting appropriate candidates for implantation. This study aimed to investigate the role of psychological profiles in predicting outcomes for ONS in rCM patients.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis on rCM patients treated with ONS at a second-level neuromodulation university facility. These patients were refractory to conventional medical treatments, including onabotulinumtoxin-A injections (monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP were not yet available). The NRS for migraine intensity, the number of monthly migraine attacks, and drug consumption were assessed at 6-month and 12-month follow-ups post-implant. Psychological profiles were evaluated prior to OCN using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2). A multivariable logistic regression model was developed to predict ONS outcomes, incorporating MMPI-2 as a covariate. The model's accuracy and performance were assessed through non-parametric bootstrap, calibration, and discrimination analyses.
resultsTwenty-three rCM patients were analysed. ONS was able to significantly reduce the pain intensity, the number of headache attacks per month, and drug consumption compared to pre-treatment levels at both 6- and 12-month follow-ups. The final multivariable logistic model at 12 months showed that the MMPI-2 Depression score was independently and negatively associated with favourable outcomes following ONS (optimism-adjusted OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.21-0.77, p = 0.03). The ROC curve indicated high model sensitivity (AUC: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.88-0.98), and the calibration plot revealed a good fit, with some improvement needed in mid-range predicted probabilities.
conclusionONS significantly reduced pain intensity, headache frequency, and drug use at the 12-month follow-up compared to pre-treatment levels. The MMPI-2 Depression score was an independent predictor of ONS failure, highlighting the importance of comprehensive psychological assessments in patient selection for ONS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.