Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40418374›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025

Research-based clinical deployment of artificial intelligence algorithm for prostate MRI.

Stephanie A Harmon, Jesse Tetreault, Omer Tarik Esengur, Ming Qin, Enis C Yilmaz, Victor Chang, Dong Yang, Ziyue Xu, Gregg Cohen, Jeff Plum and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Novel Voxel-Based MRI Risk Score LADCTCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Stephanie A HarmonNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA. stephanie.harmon@nih.gov.
Jesse TetreaultNvidia (United States), Santa Clara, USA.
Omer Tarik EsengurNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA.
Ming QinNvidia (United States), Santa Clara, USA.
Enis C YilmazNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA.
Victor ChangNvidia (United States), Santa Clara, USA.
Dong YangNvidia (United States), Santa Clara, USA.
Ziyue XuNvidia (United States), Santa Clara, USA.
Gregg CohenNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA.
Jeff PlumNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA.
Testi SherifNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA.
Ron LevinNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA.
Alexander Schmidt-RichbergPhilips (United States), Andover, USA.
Scott ThompsonPhilips (United States), Andover, USA.
Samuel CoonsPhilips (United States), Andover, USA.
Te ChenNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA.
Peter L ChoykeNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA.
Daguang XuNvidia (United States), Santa Clara, USA.
Sandeep GurramNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA.
Bradford J WoodNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA.
Peter A PintoNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA.
Baris TurkbeyNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA. turkbeyi@mail.nih.gov.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA critical limitation to deployment and utilization of Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms in radiology practice is the actual integration of algorithms directly into the clinical Picture Archiving and Communications Systems (PACS). Here, we sought to integrate an AI-based pipeline for prostate organ and intraprostatic lesion segmentation within a clinical PACS environment to enable point-of-care utilization under a prospective clinical trial scenario.

methodsA previously trained, publicly available AI model for segmentation of intra-prostatic findings on multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) was converted into a containerized environment compatible with MONAI Deploy Express. An inference server and dedicated clinical PACS workflow were established within our institution for evaluation of real-time use of the AI algorithm. PACS-based deployment was prospectively evaluated in two phases: first, a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing diagnostic imaging at our institution and second, a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing biopsy based on mpMRI findings. The AI pipeline was executed from within the PACS environment by the radiologist. AI findings were imported into clinical biopsy planning software for target definition. Metrics analyzing deployment success, timing, and detection performance were recorded and summarized.

resultsIn phase one, clinical PACS deployment was successfully executed in 57/58 cases and were obtained within one minute of activation (median 33 s [range 21-50 s]). Comparison with expert radiologist annotation demonstrated stable model performance compared to independent validation studies. In phase 2, 40/40 cases were successfully executed via PACS deployment and results were imported for biopsy targeting. Cancer detection rates for prostate cancer were 82.1% for ROI targets detected by both AI and radiologist, 47.8% in targets proposed by AI and accepted by radiologist, and 33.3% in targets identified by the radiologist alone.

conclusionsIntegration of novel AI algorithms requiring multi-parametric input into clinical PACS environment is feasible and model outputs can be used for downstream clinical tasks.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMaleProspective StudiesProstateRadiology Information SystemsArtificial intelligenceDeep learningDeploymentMRIPACSProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID40418374
PMCPMC12602619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.