ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
Research-based clinical deployment of artificial intelligence algorithm for prostate MRI.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lightweight Container Orchestration for Reproducible AI and Deep Learning Segmentation of Coronary Arteries and the Aorta in Coronary CT Angiography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Transformer-based prediction of radiotherapy couch shift risk in prostate cancer based on rectal volume.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Eating Disorder Treatment: A Qualitative Analysis of Clinical Opportunities, Barriers, and Ethical Considerations From Multi-Disciplinary Focus Groups.The International journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence standardizes CT-based body composition analysis in breast cacer to address methodological heterogeneity.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Novel Voxel-Based MRI Risk Score LADCTCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeA critical limitation to deployment and utilization of Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms in radiology practice is the actual integration of algorithms directly into the clinical Picture Archiving and Communications Systems (PACS). Here, we sought to integrate an AI-based pipeline for prostate organ and intraprostatic lesion segmentation within a clinical PACS environment to enable point-of-care utilization under a prospective clinical trial scenario.
methodsA previously trained, publicly available AI model for segmentation of intra-prostatic findings on multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) was converted into a containerized environment compatible with MONAI Deploy Express. An inference server and dedicated clinical PACS workflow were established within our institution for evaluation of real-time use of the AI algorithm. PACS-based deployment was prospectively evaluated in two phases: first, a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing diagnostic imaging at our institution and second, a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing biopsy based on mpMRI findings. The AI pipeline was executed from within the PACS environment by the radiologist. AI findings were imported into clinical biopsy planning software for target definition. Metrics analyzing deployment success, timing, and detection performance were recorded and summarized.
resultsIn phase one, clinical PACS deployment was successfully executed in 57/58 cases and were obtained within one minute of activation (median 33 s [range 21-50 s]). Comparison with expert radiologist annotation demonstrated stable model performance compared to independent validation studies. In phase 2, 40/40 cases were successfully executed via PACS deployment and results were imported for biopsy targeting. Cancer detection rates for prostate cancer were 82.1% for ROI targets detected by both AI and radiologist, 47.8% in targets proposed by AI and accepted by radiologist, and 33.3% in targets identified by the radiologist alone.
conclusionsIntegration of novel AI algorithms requiring multi-parametric input into clinical PACS environment is feasible and model outputs can be used for downstream clinical tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.