Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40418338›Full record

Trial reportOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2025

No overshoot of bone turnover after withdrawal of denosumab treatment of adults with Langerhans cell histiocytosis: a prospective clinical trial.

Polyzois Makras, Maria P Yavropoulou, Athanasios D Anastasilakis, Athanasios Papatheodorou, Socrates E Papapoulos

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Non-metastatic breast cancer patients discontinuing aromatase inhibitor on denosumab: what next?Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Polyzois MakrasDepartment of Medical Research, 251 Hellenic Air Force & VA General Hospital, 3 Kanellopoulou Str, Athens, Greece. pmakras@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3231-3357
Maria P YavropoulouDepartment of Medical Research, LCH Adult Clinic, 251 Hellenic Air Force & VA General Hospital, 3 Kanellopoulou Str, 11525, Athens, Greece.
Athanasios D AnastasilakisDepartment of Endocrinology, 424 General Military Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Athanasios PapatheodorouDepartment of Medical Research, 251 Hellenic Air Force & VA General Hospital, 3 Kanellopoulou Str, Athens, Greece.
Socrates E PapapoulosDepartment of Medical Research, 251 Hellenic Air Force & VA General Hospital, 3 Kanellopoulou Str, Athens, Greece.

Funding

Amgen Foundation The study was supported by Amgen as an Investigator Sponsored Study (ISS Ref. No: 20159460)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Denosumab (Dmab) discontinuation in osteoporosis leads to overshoot (rebound) of bone turnover, but its cause remains largely unclear. In a prospective trial, Dmab-treated Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) patients showed no overshoot of bone turnover markers despite high short-term dosing. Findings suggest that total Dmab dose does not drive the overshoot of bone turnover markers. PURPOSE: In patients with osteoporosis, the length of treatment with denosumab (Dmab) is an important risk factor for the overshoot (rebound) of bone turnover markers following its discontinuation. Whether this is due to the higher total Dmab dose given and/or the severity of the disease is unknown. To address this question, long-term follow-up of changes in bone metabolism after stopping Dmab with doses higher than those used in osteoporosis is essential.

methodsIn a prospective, single-arm, open label, phase 2b clinical trial, ten adult patients with Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH), eight with bone lesions (four single, four multiple) and two without, were treated with Dmab sc injections 120 mg/2 months for 6 months (total 480 mg) and were followed for 24 months after the last injection.

resultsTreatment reduced bone turnover markers to about 10% of pretreatment values, which increased after treatment arrest to a peak that did not exceed pretreatment levels; mean (± SD) peak serum CTX 0.522 ± 0.366 ng/mL and P1NP 72.2 ± 35.9 ng/mL were not significantly different from baseline (p = 0.11 and 0.65, respectively). Moreover, pretreatment and peak serum CTX values were significantly correlated (r

conclusionDmab withdrawal in patients with LCH was not followed by an overshoot of bone turnover markers or bone loss despite the administration in 6 months of a total dose equal to that given in osteoporosis for 4 years. Total Dmab dose is, thus, not an important determinant of the bone turnover overshoot after treatment withdrawal.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsBone RemodelingDenosumabHistiocytosis, Langerhans-CellOsteoporosisAdultAgedBiomarkersBone DensityDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesWithholding TreatmentBiomarkersBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabBone markersDenosumabDiscontinuationLangerhans cell histiocytosisOvershootingRebound

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.