Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40418310›Full record

ReviewJournal of gambling studies2025

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Responsible Gambling Messages: A Rapid Evidence Assessment.

Gray E Gaudett, Paul Pellizzari, Richard T A Wood, Michael J A Wohl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gambling studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gray E GaudettDepartment of Psychology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-9588-6729
Paul PellizzariHard Rock International, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA.
Richard T A WoodGamRes Limited, Arnprior, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0027-3784
Michael J A WohlDepartment of Psychology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6, Canada. michael.wohl@carleton.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6945-5562

Funding

Mitacs IT42668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To minimize the harms associated with gambling, an array of responsible gambling (RG) messages has been developed to raise awareness of the risks of problem gambling and encourage safer gambling behaviors. However, evidence is limited as to the utility of RG messages to promote positive gambling-related beliefs and behaviors. In the current paper, we report the results of a Rapid Evidence Assessment (REA) of empirical research on RG messages. We identified 3200 unique articles published between 1890 and September 2024 using search terms related to RG messaging. Eighteen articles (containing 20 unique studies) met our inclusion criteria. Two general themes emerged: 1) RG message preferences among players and 2) RG message effectiveness. Specifically, players prefer self-appraisal messages, which were more effective in promoting RG behaviors compared to informative messages. Messages content also needs to be segmented (i.e., low-risk players prefer different types of messages than high risk players, such as highlighting player quizzes for low-risk players and helplines for high-risk players). Lastly, RG messages should be presented dynamically (e.g., pop-ups on an Electronic Gaming Machine: EGM). Results suggest a need for the gambling industry to adopt targeted, evidence-based RG messaging, as well as a need to engage in integrated knowledge mobilization, to more effectively promote RG. These findings underscore the importance of tailoring RG messages to player risk levels and preferences while leveraging dynamic delivery methods to maximize their effectiveness in promoting safer gambling behaviors and reducing harm.

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictiveGamblingPersuasive CommunicationHumansGamblingPlayer segmentationPositive playResponsible gamblingResponsible gambling messagingSelf-appraisal messages

Identifiers

PMID40418310
PMCPMC12361340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.