Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40418294›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2025

Multiomics in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Current Landscape and Future Directions for Precision Medicine.

Filippo Gavi, Maria Chiara Sighinolfi, Giuseppe Pallotta, Simone Assumma, Enrico Panio, Daniele Fettucciari, Antonio Silvestri, Pierluigi Russo, Riccardo Bientinesi, Nazario Foschi and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Filippo Gavi *Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, 00168, Italy. filippo.gavi@guest.policlinicogemelli.it.
Maria Chiara Sighinolfi *Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, 00168, Italy.
Giuseppe PallottaDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, 00168, Italy.
Simone AssummaDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, 00168, Italy.
Enrico PanioDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, 00168, Italy.
Daniele FettucciariDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, 00168, Italy.
Antonio SilvestriDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, 00168, Italy.
Pierluigi RussoDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, 00168, Italy.
Riccardo BientinesiDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, 00168, Italy.
Nazario FoschiDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, 00168, Italy.
Filippo TurriDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, 00168, Italy.
Umberto CarbonaraUnit of Urology, Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy.
Chiara CiccareseDepartment of Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, 00168, Italy.
Roberto IacovelliDepartment of Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, 00168, Italy.
Camilla NeroDepartment of Women and Child Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, 00168, Italy.
Bernardo RoccoDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, 00168, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewRenal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a prevalent and increasingly diagnosed malignancy associated with high mortality and recurrence rates. Traditional diagnostic and therapeutic approaches have limitations due to the disease's molecular heterogeneity. This review aims to explore how the integration of omics sciences-genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics-can enhance the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of RCC. RECENT

findingsGenomic analyses have uncovered critical mutations, including VHL, PBRM1, and BAP1, which support improved risk stratification and the development of targeted therapies. Transcriptomic and spatial transcriptomic studies have provided deeper insights into RCC heterogeneity and tumor microenvironment dynamics. Proteomic investigations have revealed potential biomarkers, while metabolomic approaches have highlighted RCC-specific metabolic shifts. Despite these advancements, several challenges persist, including intratumoral heterogeneity, difficulties in multi-omics data integration, and the limited clinical validation of biomarkers. Omics-driven approaches hold significant promise for advancing precision medicine in RCC. These technologies can facilitate earlier diagnosis, guide individualized therapies, and enhance prognostic evaluations. Future research must focus on validating multi-omic biomarkers and leveraging artificial intelligence to manage complex datasets, thereby supporting more informed clinical decision-making and personalized treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellGenomicsKidney NeoplasmsPrecision MedicineBiomarkers, TumorHumansMetabolomicsMultiomicsProteomicsBiomarkers, TumorClear cell carcinomaKidney cancerOmics sciencesRenal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID40418294
PMCPMC12106551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.