ReviewBlood research2025
Diagnosis and management of neutropenia.
Review in Blood research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Off-target anti-leukemic effects of antibiotics: mechanisms and therapeutic insights.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2026Review
- Article
- The multidimensional signaling of ELANE: from congenital hematopoietic failure to immune microenvironment crosstalk and targeted interventions.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
- Article
- Beyond the Neutrophil Count: Functional Profiling and Targeted Modulation of Neutrophils in Paediatric Care.Journal of innate immunity · 2026Review
- Isolated Chronic Neutropenia in Adults: Causes, Diagnostic Work-Up, and Management-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeNeutropenia is a hematologic condition characterized by an absolute neutrophil count < 1500/μL, associated with increased infection risk. This review aimed to provide an updated overview of the classification, pathophysiology, etiology, diagnosis, and management of neutropenia in congenital and acquired forms.
methodsWe conducted a comprehensive literature review of various causes of neutropenia, including genetic syndromes, autoimmune disorders, infections, and drug-induced mechanisms. Emphasis was placed on clinical manifestations, underlying mechanisms, diagnostic algorithms, and therapeutic approaches, including recent advances in molecular diagnostics and biologic therapies.
resultsNeutropenia can result from decreased neutrophil production, immune-mediated destruction, or abnormal distribution. Congenital neutropenia is often linked to mutations in genes such as ELANE, HAX1, and SBDS. Acquired neutropenia can be caused by chemotherapy, infections, autoimmune diseases, or nutritional deficiencies. Diagnostic evaluation requires a stepwise approach incorporating clinical history, blood counts, peripheral smear, bone marrow biopsy, and molecular or serologic testing. Treatment depends on the etiology and severity and includes granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, immunosuppressants, antimicrobial prophylaxis, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in selected cases.
conclusionNeutropenia is a multifactorial disorder requiring individualized evaluation and management. Advances in genetic and immunological diagnostics combined with targeted therapies have improved risk stratification and outcomes. Early recognition and a multidisciplinary approach are essential to reduce infection-related morbidity and prevent progression to hematologic malignancies in high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.