Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40418265›Full record

ReviewBlood research2025

Diagnosis and management of neutropenia.

Kyoung Il Min, Seonggyu Byeon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kyoung Il MinCollege of Medicine, Catholic Hematology Hospital, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea.
Seonggyu ByeonCollege of Medicine, Catholic Hematology Hospital, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea. bichon3@cmcnu.or.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNeutropenia is a hematologic condition characterized by an absolute neutrophil count < 1500/μL, associated with increased infection risk. This review aimed to provide an updated overview of the classification, pathophysiology, etiology, diagnosis, and management of neutropenia in congenital and acquired forms.

methodsWe conducted a comprehensive literature review of various causes of neutropenia, including genetic syndromes, autoimmune disorders, infections, and drug-induced mechanisms. Emphasis was placed on clinical manifestations, underlying mechanisms, diagnostic algorithms, and therapeutic approaches, including recent advances in molecular diagnostics and biologic therapies.

resultsNeutropenia can result from decreased neutrophil production, immune-mediated destruction, or abnormal distribution. Congenital neutropenia is often linked to mutations in genes such as ELANE, HAX1, and SBDS. Acquired neutropenia can be caused by chemotherapy, infections, autoimmune diseases, or nutritional deficiencies. Diagnostic evaluation requires a stepwise approach incorporating clinical history, blood counts, peripheral smear, bone marrow biopsy, and molecular or serologic testing. Treatment depends on the etiology and severity and includes granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, immunosuppressants, antimicrobial prophylaxis, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in selected cases.

conclusionNeutropenia is a multifactorial disorder requiring individualized evaluation and management. Advances in genetic and immunological diagnostics combined with targeted therapies have improved risk stratification and outcomes. Early recognition and a multidisciplinary approach are essential to reduce infection-related morbidity and prevent progression to hematologic malignancies in high-risk patients.

Indexed as

Autoimmune neutropeniaChemotherapy-induced neutropeniaG-CSFNeutropenia

Identifiers

PMID40418265
PMCPMC12106181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.