ReviewWorld journal of urology2025
Can preoperative transurethral catherization reduce the risk of urethral stricture after endoscopic treatment of the prostate?
Review in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The relationship between urethral catheterization before TUR-P and postoperative stricture.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Clinical application of the F21 multipurpose cystoscope with continuous irrigation capability.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Cepharanthine may inhibit the proliferation of prostate cells by blocking the EGFR/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway: comprehensive network analysis, molecular docking, and experimental evaluation.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urethral strictures are a well-known complication following endoscopic treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Although the exact cause remains unclear, repetitive instrument movement and pressure-induced ischemia are likely contributing factors. While the incidence seems lower after enucleation compared to transurethral resection of the prostate, it remains important to prevent this iatrogenic complication. A small randomized trial suggested a benefit from preoperative urethral dilatation, though findings were constrained by limited sample size and follow-up. Similarly, studies comparing resectoscope sizes have not yet demonstrated significant differences in stricture rates. Drawing parallels with ureteral stricture prevention, where prestenting with a ureteral catheter is commonly used, we hypothesize that preoperative transurethral catheterization may relax and dilate the urethra, potentially lowering the risk of stricture formation. Clinical observations support this: patients with preoperative indwelling catheters before endoscopic treatment of BPH often display a more compliant urethra during surgery. While mechanical irritation remains a theoretical concern of placing a catheter, the relaxing effect may outweigh potential harm, much like DJ-stent use in the ureter. A prospective study will be conducted within the EAU Endourology Consortium to evaluate this hypothesis, incorporating force-sensing dilators and standardized follow-up with uroflowmetry and cystoscopy at 3 and 6 months. If successful, preoperative catheterization may offer a simple, low-risk strategy to reduce urethral strictures in BPH surgery, particularly in patients with a narrow urethra.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40418263What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.