Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40418255›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2025

Audiovisual integration of speech: evidence for increased accuracy in "talk" versus "listen" condition.

Lefteris Themelis Zografos, Anna Konstantoulaki, Christoph Klein, Argiro Vatakis, Nikolaos Smyrnis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lefteris Themelis ZografosLaboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Sensorimotor Control, University Mental Health Neurosciences and Precision Medicine Research Institute "COSTAS STEFANIS", Athens, Greece.
Anna KonstantoulakiLaboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Sensorimotor Control, University Mental Health Neurosciences and Precision Medicine Research Institute "COSTAS STEFANIS", Athens, Greece.
Christoph Klein2nd Psychiatry Department, National, and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, University General Hospital «AΤΤΙΚΟΝ», Athens, Greece.
Argiro VatakisMultisensory and Temporal Processing Laboratory (MultiTimeLab), Department of Psychology, Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, Athens, Greece. argiro.vatakis@gmail.com.
Nikolaos SmyrnisLaboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Sensorimotor Control, University Mental Health Neurosciences and Precision Medicine Research Institute "COSTAS STEFANIS", Athens, Greece. smyrnis@uoa.gr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Processing of sensory stimuli generated by our own actions differs from that of externally generated stimuli. However, most evidence regarding this phenomenon concerns the processing of unisensory stimuli. A few studies have explored the effect of self-generated actions on multisensory stimuli and how it affects the integration of these stimuli. Most of them used abstract stimuli (e.g., flashes, beeps) rather than more natural ones such as sensations that are commonly correlated with actions that we perform in our everyday lives such as speech. In the current study, we explored the effect of self-generated action on the process of multisensory integration (MSI) during speech. We used a novel paradigm where participants were either listening to the echo of their own speech, while watching a video of themselves producing the same speech ("talk", active condition), or they listened to their previously recorded speech and watched the prerecorded video of themselves producing the same speech ("listen", passive condition). In both conditions, different stimulus onset asynchronies were introduced between the auditory and visual streams and participants were asked to perform simultaneity judgments. Using these judgments, we determined temporal binding windows (TBW) of integration for each participant and condition. We found that the TBW was significantly smaller in the active as compared to the passive condition indicating more accurate MSI. These results support the conclusion that sensory perception is modulated by self-generated action at the multisensory in addition to the unisensory level.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionSpeechSpeech PerceptionVisual PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultFemaleHumansJudgmentMalePhotic StimulationYoung AdultMovementMultisensory integrationSelf-generated actionSpeechTemporal binding window

Identifiers

PMID40418255
PMCPMC12106506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.