Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40418223›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2025

Personally valued voices engage reward-motivated behaviour and brain responses.

Elise Kanber, Jonathan P Roiser, Carolyn McGettigan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elise KanberSpeech, Hearing and Phonetic Sciences, UCL, 2 Wakefield Street, London WC1N 1PF, United Kingdom.
Jonathan P RoiserInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, UCL, 17 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AZ, United Kingdom.
Carolyn McGettiganSpeech, Hearing and Phonetic Sciences, UCL, 2 Wakefield Street, London WC1N 1PF, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6293-3795

Funding

Research Leadership Award RL-2016-013The Leverhulme Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans often attach notions of value to hearing the voices of specific loved ones, yet there is sparse scientific evidence supporting these claims. We present three experiments-two behavioural and one neuroimaging functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)-that tested whether personally-valued voices engage reward-motivated behaviour and associated brain responses. Using novel voice incentive delay tasks, we show that listeners respond faster in anticipation of hearing the speaking voice of their music idol than when anticipating an unfamiliar voice or a pure tone (Experiment 1). A second behavioural experiment indicated that familiarity alone was insufficient to engage stronger reward-motivated behaviour in comparison with an unfamiliar identity (Experiment 2). These behavioural patterns were further reflected in an fMRI experiment, where the idol voice condition most strongly engaged brain regions associated with reward processing while responses to other familiar and unfamiliar voice conditions were often equivalent (Experiment 3). Taken together, these studies provide evidence that voices can be effective rewards, in particular when they are associated with intense parasocial interest. Future research should determine whether these findings generalize to personally known individuals.

Indexed as

BrainMotivationRewardVoiceAcoustic StimulationAdultAuditory PerceptionBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRecognition, PsychologyYoung Adultfamiliar voicesfMRImotivationrewardvoice identityvoice perception

Identifiers

PMID40418223
PMCPMC12366989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.