ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2025
A Global Scoping Review on Alternative Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Foods.
Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Local High-Protein, Plant-Based Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Food Enhances Recovery from Malnutrition in Rats.Current developments in nutrition · 2026Article
- Geographic priorities in the global action plan for wasting: Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Kenya and Malawi.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2026Article
- Rice Bran Supplements the Nutritional Density of Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Foods: A Targeted Nutrient and Non-Targeted Metabolomic Analysis.Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Combating Malnutrition: Nutrient and Energy Composition of Locally Formulated Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Foods for Children.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Comparison of the Nutritional Value of Locally Formulated Food Preparations and Standard Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Foods for the Management of Uncomplicated Severe Acute Malnutrition in Children Under Five in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alternative ready-to-use therapeutic foods (RUTF) formulations provide an opportunity to lower costs, facilitate local or national ingredient use, and enhance the availability and acceptability of RUTF. This scoping review aimed to identify and categorise the available evidence on alternative RUTF formulations developed and tested globally, assess their compliance with international standards and summarise evidence on acceptability, cost, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and adverse events, highlighting evidence gaps to guide future research. Searches of three databases and extensive grey literature were conducted covering the period from 1999 to June 2023. Fifty-four articles, 42 peer-reviewed articles and 12 grey literature sources were included. Fifty-three RUTF formulations at various development stages for the treatment of severe acute malnutrition (SAM) without medical complications in children 6-59 months were identified. Numerous ingredients have undergone testing to replace primarily peanuts and/or milk, demonstrating consistent acceptance and promising results in terms of effectiveness. Evidence on outcomes beyond anthropometric recovery, such as higher iron status, and effects on cognitive and developmental outcomes or gut microbiome, is also limited. Few studies evaluated the cost implications, revealing potential savings in production costs while no significant differences were found in terms of safety. Additional evidence is required on how reduced or milk-free formulations within the innovation and novel categories can achieve compliance with the required protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS) recommendations. Further research is also needed with specific focus on outcomes beyond anthropometric recovery such as cost-effectiveness, accessibility, macro and micronutrient deficiencies, sustainability of recovery and longer term health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.