Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40418146›Full record

Trial reportHealth technology assessment (Winchester, England)2025

Sputum colour charts to guide antibiotic self-treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the Colour-COPD RCT.

Eleni Gkini, Rachel L Adams, Daniella Spittle, Paul Ellis, Katherine Allsopp, Sanya Saleem, Matthew McKenna, Nick le Mesurier, Nicola Gale, Sarah Tearne and 4 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Eleni GkiniBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8083-2947
Rachel L AdamsHealth Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1798-3854
Daniella SpittleDepartment of Inflammation and Aging, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4054-0314
Paul EllisDepartment of Applied Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3817-3882
Katherine AllsoppIndependent patient/public co-analyst, Institute of Education (UCL), London, UK.ORCID 0009-0007-4559-725X
Sanya SaleemIndependent patient/public co-analyst, Institute of Education (UCL), London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0666-2895
Matthew McKennaHealth Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7425-2062
Nick le MesurierHealth Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0009-0006-3759-0552
Nicola GaleHealth Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5295-8841
Sarah TearneBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7944-2917
Peymane AdabDepartment of Applied Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9087-3945
Rachel E JordanDepartment of Applied Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0747-6883
Nawar Diar BakerlyRespiratory Medicine, Salford Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2102-1997
Alice M TurnerDepartment of Applied Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5947-3254

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations (acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) are characterised by increased sputum volume, purulence and breathlessness. Patients are encouraged to recognise and treat acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as part of a self-management plan. Only half of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are caused by bacterial infection, but self-management plans generally advocate use of antibiotics and steroids for all events, hence antibiotics may be overused. Sputum colour relates closely to bacterial load; thus it could determine whether antibiotics are appropriate. This pragmatic randomised controlled trial tested whether use of a sputum colour chart is safe and effective in United Kingdom primary care. Methods: Colour chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was a multicentre, randomised controlled trial in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who had ≥ 2 acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or ≥ 1 hospital admission for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the preceding year. The primary objective was to demonstrate that the Bronkotest Limitations: The study was terminated early due to low recruitment (115/2954 planned sample size). Results: One hundred and fifteen patients were recruited and randomised 1 : 1 to colour chart use or usual care; they generally had severe Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease D chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, with significant breathlessness (54% Medical Research Council score of 4 or 5) and poor quality of life (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test score at baseline 24). Comorbid respiratory and systemic disease was common. Self-management was delivered well in both arms, and the colour chart acceptable to patients and staff; no specific issues for patients with multiple long-term conditions were identified. Hospital admissions for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease tended to occur more in colour chart users [32 vs. 16%, relative risk 1.95 (0.92 to 4.18)], and antibiotic courses within 14 days of initial acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treatment were also more common [34 vs. 18%, adjusted relative risk 1.80 (0.85 to 3.79)]. Despite this, quality of life was better in colour chart users at 12 months [chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test 19.9 vs. -24.5, adjusted mean difference -2.95 (-5.93 to -0.04)]. Thirty-eight patients consented to the sputum substudy, and 57 samples were received (42 stable state, 15 during acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), of which 30% contained a potentially pathogenic bacterium. Sputum was more likely to be purulent in subjects with bronchiectasis, independent of disease state (stable vs. exacerbation) or whether the sample was positive for a potentially pathogenic bacterium, suggesting that colour alone cannot be used to guide antibiotic use. Eleven patients completed the e-diary study, and 42 symptom-defined acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease events were captured, many of which were untreated, exhibiting lower EXAcerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool scores than those which were treated. Untreated events were slower to settle. Differences between study arms were not meaningful to compute due to low numbers. Conclusion and future work: Our results imply that the Bronkotest sputum colour chart is unlikely to be a useful addition to self-management for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients in primary care, but further work is required to confirm this. Funding: This synopsis presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme as award number 17/128/04.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveSelf CareSputumAgedColorDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeUnited KingdomAnti-Bacterial AgentsCHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASECLINICAL TRIALEXACERBATIONSSELF-MANAGEMENTSPUTUM

Identifiers

PMID40418146
PMCPMC12403665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.