Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40418023›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2025

Probing Limitations of Co-Alchemical Charge Changes in Free-Energy Calculations.

Nadine Grundschober, Dražen Petrov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nadine GrundschoberBOKU University Institute of Molecular Modeling and Simulation, Department of Natural Sciences and Sustainable Resources Muthgasse 18, 1190 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0009-0002-8594-3894
Dražen PetrovBOKU University Institute of Molecular Modeling and Simulation, Department of Natural Sciences and Sustainable Resources Muthgasse 18, 1190 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6221-7369

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular dynamics simulations are nowadays one of the key methods to investigate the (thermo)dynamics of protein-ligand binding at atomic resolution. The calculation of binding free energies of charged species is an encountered problem in molecular dynamic simulations. This is due to the approximation of the long-range electrostatic interaction. Here, we explore the discrepancies and biases of different approaches and whether and under which circumstances robust and reliable free-energy differences can be obtained using alchemical methods in combination with the lattice sum electrostatics treatment. Testing various setups and well-established approaches shows that the obtained free energies strongly depend on the initial setup choices. Different unconventional schemes, for example, placing more copies of perturbed species in a simulation box, were tested and showed partial success. Although they still suffer from pitfalls, they present a promising alternative approach in addressing the challenges related to non-neutral perturbations.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationProteinsThermodynamicsLigandsStatic ElectricityLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID40418023
PMCPMC12159973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.