Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40417983›Full record

ArticleThe Milbank quarterly2025

Who Enrolls in Coverage and Who Remains Uninsured? Medicaid Take-Up Before and After the Affordable Care Act and During Unwinding.

Rebecca Brooks Smith, Gabriella Aboulafia, Benjamin D Sommers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Milbank quarterly, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The role of nonfinancial factors in the Congressional Budget Office's health insurance coverage projections.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Structural determinants of Medicaid enrollment in late life.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rebecca Brooks SmithBloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University.ORCID 0009-0004-5796-4852
Gabriella AboulafiaHarvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health.
Benjamin D SommersHarvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Policy Points The Affordable Care Act (ACA) dramatically expanded Medicaid eligibility in participating states. However, many eligible individuals remain uninsured because they do not enroll in (or "take up") coverage. The unwinding of the pandemic continuous enrollment provision in 2023-2024 further raised the importance of this issue. After the ACA, we found a significant increase in Medicaid take-up among eligible individuals across all eligibility pathways; these gains persisted into 2023, which coincided with the beginning of the unwinding. However, important vulnerabilities in enrollment are still apparent, including a steep drop-off in take-up when children become young adults and persistent lower take-up among childless adults and residents of nonexpansion states. These findings can guide policies in the postpandemic post-ACA era and suggest that efforts to reduce outreach or scale back the ACA will threaten coverage for many Medicaid beneficiaries. CONTEXT: Many uninsured individuals in the United States are eligible for Medicaid but not enrolled. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) expanded Medicaid eligibility starting in 2014, streamlined enrollment, and boosted outreach. During the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, states were required to provide continuous coverage to Medicaid enrollees, a policy that ended in April 2023, with resulting coverage losses during the "unwinding" of this policy.

methodsUsing household data from the American Community Survey and state-level eligibility criteria, we assessed Medicaid participation among US citizens younger than 65 years old who either had Medicaid coverage or no insurance. We compared results before the ACA (2008-2010), after the ACA (2017-2019), and during "unwinding" (2023). We utilized logistic regression to identify predictors of take-up in each of these time periods.

findingsThe national take-up rate among Medicaid-eligible individuals rose from 76.5% before the ACA to 85.0% after the ACA. These gains persisted in 2023 as unwinding began, when take-up was slightly higher (86.5%) than before the pandemic. Post-ACA participation was highest among eligible children; Asian American, Pacific Islander, and Native Hawaiian and Black individuals; and residents of expansion states. Participation was lowest among adults ages 19-21 years old, American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) individuals, employed adults, and those facing premiums for Medicaid coverage. Take-up improved post-ACA in both more and less deprived neighborhoods, whereas urban areas saw greater growth in take-up than rural areas.

conclusionsFrom the pre- to post-ACA period, Medicaid take-up rates among eligible individuals increased, and these gains persisted during the beginning of the unwinding period, potentially reflecting increased outreach efforts under the Biden administration. However, areas of vulnerability remain among young adults, working adults, AI/AN individuals, and those in rural areas. These findings have important implications as the unwinding period ends, and large changes to Medicaid may be considered after the 2024 elections.

Indexed as

Insurance CoverageMedicaidMedically UninsuredPatient Protection and Affordable Care ActAdolescentAdultChildCOVID-19Eligibility DeterminationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesYoung AdultAffordable Care Acteligibilityenrollmenthealth insuranceMedicaidunwinding

Identifiers

PMID40417983
PMCPMC12185360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.