ArticleCurrent medicinal chemistry2026
Identification of Hub Genes and Prediction of Interacting Chemicals in Parkinson's Disease Using Bioinformatics.
Article in Current medicinal chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrative Machine-Learning Molecular Subtyping and Risk Scores of Circadian Rhythm-Related Prognostic Signatures in Colorectal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundParkinson's disease (PD) ranks as the second most prevalent neurodegenerative disorder globally, with its etiology intricately linked to a complex interplay of genetic predispositions and environmental factors.
methodsA comprehensive comparative analysis of the substantia nigra transcriptome between patients with PD and controls, utilizing data from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repository, enabled the identification and validation of key hub genes associated with PD. This analysis was further substantiated at the single-cell level. The study identified four candidate chemicals potentially interacting with the proteins encoded by these hub genes, followed by molecular docking to evaluate binding affinities.
resultsDDC, KCNJ6, SLC18A2, and SLC6A3 were identified as central to PD pathology, with Benzo(a)pyrene, Bisphenol A, Valproic Acid, and Fulvestrant as corresponding chemical agents. Molecular docking demonstrated Benzo(a)pyrene's highest binding affinity, with SLC6A3 emerging as the most vulnerable target among the hub genes.
conclusionThese findings underscore the roles of DDC, KCNJ6, SLC18A2, and SLC6A3 in PD's molecular mechanisms, potentially modulated by the identified chemicals, with Benzo(a)pyrene highlighted as a significant environmental toxin. This study offers novel insights into the genetic and environmental determinants of PD, advancing our understanding of its etiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40417757What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.