ArticleREC, interventional cardiology
The MANTA Vascular Closure Device in transfemoral TAVI: a real-world cohort.
Article in REC, interventional cardiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Vascular closure devices: the jury is still out.REC, interventional cardiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and objectives: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established treatment option for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis often performed via transfemoral access route (TF-TAVI). Therefore, successful closure of large-bore access sites is essential. This study aims to investigate the safety and effectiveness of the MANTA (Teleflex/Essential Medical, United States) vascular closure device (VCD) in patients undergoing TF-TAVI in an unselected and consecutive cohort of patients. Methods: We conducted a single-center, observational study of 245 consecutive patients undergoing TF-TAVI in whom the arterial large-bore femoral access was closed with a MANTA device from March 2020 through February 2022. The primary efficacy outcome measure was the rate of VCD failure according to the VARC-3 definition. Results: Successful closure of the large-bore access site occurred in 92.2% of the patients (n = 226). According to the VARC-3 definition, no major vascular or bleeding complications related to the plug-based VCD were reported. Patients with failed VCDs (7.8%) had significantly smaller minimal femoral artery diameters (6.6 ± 1.1 mm vs 7.6 ± 1.4 mm; Conclusions: In this single-center, real-world, unselected large cohort of consecutive patients treated with TF-TAVI, a plug-based VCD for large-bore arteriotomy closure turned out effective and safe, and enabled arterial access-site management with a low rate of complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.