Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40417655›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2025

Identification of universal grass genes and estimates of their monocot-/commelinid-/grass-specificity.

Rowan A C Mitchell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rowan A C MitchellSustainable Soils and Crops, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1412-8828

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Where experiments identify sets of grass genes of unknown function, e.g. underlying a QTL or co-expressed in a transcriptome, it is useful to know which of these genes are common to all grasses (universal) and whether they likely have monocot-/commelinid-/grass-specific function. Results: A pipeline used data on 16 grass full genomes from Ensembl Plants to generate 13 312 highly conserved, universal groups of grass protein-coding genes. Validation steps showed that 98.8% of these groups also had gene matches in recently sequenced genomes from two major grass clades not used in the pipeline. Comparison with many non-grass genomes identified 4609 of these groups as likely of monocot-/commelinid-/grass-specific function. Both grouping of genes and specificity were defined using hidden Markov model (HMM) profiles of the groups. The HMM-based approach performed better than simple percentage identity in discriminating between test sets of known specific and non-specific genes. The results give novel insight into the nature of monocot-/commelinid-/grass-specific genes. Researchers can use the universal_grass_peps database to gain evidence for their experimentally identified grass genes being involved in monocot-/commelinid-/grass-specific traits. Availability and implementation: The universal_grass_peps database is available for download at https://data.rothamsted.ac.uk/dataset/universal_grass_peps.

Identifiers

PMID40417655
PMCPMC12098945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.