ArticleTherapeutic advances in drug safety2025
Pharmacist support in the entry of blood drug concentration test order avoids vancomycin-induced kidney injury.
Article in Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of pharmacist intervention on therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Task shifting and sharing have been proposed as strategies to address healthcare staffing shortages and improve patient outcomes. In emergency and intensive care medicine, pharmacist interventions have shown potential to reduce medication errors and improve care quality. However, the precise benefits of pharmacist support in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for emergency center inpatients require further verification. Objective: To determine the contribution of pharmacist support in entering blood drug concentration test orders to patient safety during anti-methicillin-resistant Design: Single-center retrospective cohort study comparing outcomes 2 years before and 2 years after implementing pharmacist support for blood concentration test order entry. Methods: Patients receiving intravenous vancomycin with blood concentrations measured at the emergency center were included. Propensity score matching was used to minimize confounding. The primary outcome was the change in frequency of vancomycin-induced kidney injury before and after pharmacist support implementation. Results: Pharmacist support significantly reduced the frequency of vancomycin-induced kidney injury (from 6.5% to 0.0%, Conclusion: Pharmacist support in entering blood drug concentration test orders significantly reduced vancomycin-induced kidney injury frequency and shortened time to first TDM, enhancing patient safety during anti-MRSA medication administration in the emergency and critical care center. This task-shifting approach demonstrates clear benefits for patient care and physician workload.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.