ArticleToxicology reports2025
Safety toxicology of an IL-2 'no-alpha' mutein in the Sprague-Dawley rat following repeated dosing via intravenous administration.
Article in Toxicology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Editorial: Special issue on Current developments in immunotherapy and related toxicities.Toxicology reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The potential toxicity, safety and anti-drug antibody production of the novel IL-2 "no-alpha" mutein is in need of investigation as it may be a critical candidate for cancer therapy. The design of this mutein is meant to reduce toxicity compared to the IL-2 wildtype by disrupting interactions with the alpha receptor (CD25) and increasing the efficacy of the treatment. This was assessed following administration to Sprague-Dawley rats intravenously (IV), and it occurred over three cycles of five days each with daily dosing, with a 9-day washout period between each cycle. For the mutein dose groups, animals were dosed via IV at dose levels of 600, 6000, 18,000 U/kg. This dosing regimen is equivalent to 1x, 10x, and 30x the proposed first human dose, respectively. This study also assessed the progression or regression of any effects following a 14-day treatment-free recovery period for the control and high dose groups. Rats that were administered the "no-alpha" mutein at 600 and 6000 U/kg were well-tolerated with no apparent abnormal observations in general health, behaviour and autonomic function. There was no evidence of systemic toxicity based on evaluations in clinical pathology, gross necropsy and histopathology. At 18,000 U/kg (30x), abnormal clinical signs were observed at the injection sites consisting of localized swelling, discoloration, scabbing and necrosis. These animals showed a significant recovery in abnormal localized clinical signs following the treatment free period. Additionally other parameters did not indicate any significantly detrimental effects at this dose level. Therefore, the IL-2 mutein "no-alpha" seems to hold promise as a valuable addition to the current array of cancer therapy strategies, especially at the proposed dose level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.