Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40417589›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2024

Secondary Use of Clinical Problem List Descriptions for Bi-Encoder Based ICD-10 Classification.

Markus Kreuzthaler, Bastian Pfeifer, Stefan Schulz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Markus KreuzthalerInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Austria.
Bastian PfeiferInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Austria.
Stefan SchulzInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Annotated language resources are essential for supervised machine learning methods. In the clinical domain, such data sets can boost use-case specific natural language processing services. In this work, we have analyzed a clinical problem list table consisting of millions of ICD-10 codes assigned to short problem list descriptions in German. We have investigated whether the given data forms a valuable resource within a secondary use case scenario for coding support. Our proposed methodology exploits an embedding-based k-NN classifier, which was evaluated based on its coding performance, leveraging the multilingual BERT based language model SapBERT-UMLS in comparison with medBERT.de, which is specifically tailored to medical and clinical language resources in German. Our approach reached a weighted F1-measure of 0.87 using SapBERT-UMLS and an F1-measure of 0.86 for medBERT.de. The approach revealed promising coding results when reusing annotated language resources out of clinical routine documentation.

Indexed as

Clinical CodingInternational Classification of DiseasesNatural Language ProcessingHumansMachine LearningUnified Medical Language System

Identifiers

PMID40417589
PMCPMC12099355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.