Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40417577›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2024

SeqTrial: Utility Preserving Sequential Clinical Trial Data Generator.

Trisha Das, Afrah Shafquat, Mandis Beigi, Jacob Aptekar, Jason Mezey, Jimeng Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Trisha DasUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
Afrah ShafquatMedidata, New York, NY.
Mandis BeigiMedidata, New York, NY.
Jacob AptekarMedidata, New York, NY.
Jason MezeyCornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Jimeng SunUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical trial data used to evaluate new treatments have value beyond the original studies, but limitations in data access due to privacy concerns make further use of these data challenging. Digital twins offer a solution by simulating patient outcomes, providing less restricted data access, reducing costs and increasing sample sizes. However, existing research focuses on synthetic Electronic Healthcare Records (EHRs) and lacks personalized patient record generation. This paper introduces SeqTrial, a framework for generating personalized digital twins for sequential clinical trial event data. The method uses BioBERT word embeddings to capture biomedical term semantics, an attention mechanism to understand visit relationships, and synthesizes digital twins for each patient. SeqTrial generates utility-preserving digital twins capable of estimating clinical outcomes, while addressing data scarcity through self-supervised pretraining. The method demonstrates high fidelity and utility in generating synthetic sequential clinical trial data for patient outcome prediction while ensuring privacy protection. The code is available at.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicElectronic Health RecordsConfidentialityHumans

Identifiers

PMID40417577
PMCPMC12099387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.