Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40417560›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2024

Exploring the use of Artificial Genomes for Genome-wide Association Studies through the lens of Utility and Privacy.

Xinyue Wang, Sitao Min, Jaideep Vaidya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Descriptor:IEEE data descriptions · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xinyue WangRutgers University, Newark, NJ.
Sitao MinRutgers University, Newark, NJ.
Jaideep VaidyaRutgers University, Newark, NJ.

Funding

Accelerating Genomic Data Sharing and Collaborative Research with Privacy ProtectionR01LM014520 · NLM · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI Erman Ayday, Xiaoqian Jiang · 2023 to 2026
$2.6M
Supplement for high performance compute clustersR35GM134927 · NIGMS · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI VAIDYA, JAIDEEP · 2020 to 2024
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM134927NLM NIH HHS R01 LM014520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collaborative Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have the potential to uncover rare genetic variant-trait associations by leveraging larger datasets and diverse population samples. Despite this potential, privacy concerns and cumbersome review processes for data validation and collaborator selection hinder their broader implementation. Advances in generative models present a possible solution by generating synthetic datasets that closely resemble real genomic data, thus enhancing privacy and expediting the review process. This study assesses the capability of deep generative models to produce artificial genomic data for GWAS applications. We evaluate two state-of-the-art models on real-world datasets, identifying significant limitations in their ability to generate high-quality artificial genomes. Furthermore, we demonstrate that prevailing privacy measures, mainly based on membership inference attacks, are inadequate for providing insightful privacy evaluations. Our findings highlight the critical challenges and suggest future directions for the effective use of artificial genomes in GWAS.

Indexed as

Genetic PrivacyGenome-Wide Association StudyPrivacyHumans

Identifiers

PMID40417560
PMCPMC12099349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.