Discovery of User Requirements to Support Remote Health Coaching and Care Coordination in a CMS Demonstration Project.

Katrina K Boles, Lisa Young, Chuka Emezue, Knoo Lee, Lori Popejoy, Blaine Reeder

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katrina K BolesInstitute for Data Science and Informatics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.

Lisa YoungSinclair School of Nursing, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.

Chuka EmezueRush University, Chicago, IL, USA.

Knoo LeeInstitute for Data Science and Informatics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.

Lori PopejoyInstitute for Data Science and Informatics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.

Blaine ReederInstitute for Data Science and Informatics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remote interventionists in the novel ASSETs for Aging in Place demonstration project rely on smart home and wearable sensor data to understand daily behavior patterns of older adult clients discharged from nursing homes to the community and to inform coaching during telehealth visits to help clients self-manage personal goals for health and independence. We employed contextual inquiry during design of the interventionist dashboard to support the new ASSETs program. Focus groups with interventionists and leadership characterized themes for primary dashboard goals, interface and technology needs, and data collection expectations. Four contextual inquiry sessions with interventionists characterized user goals, barriers, and standardized user workflows. We articulated a sequential discovery process for user requirements that can be replicated in dashboard design for future remote service delivery programs that will rely on sensor data and telehealth visits.

Indexed as

MentoringTelemedicineAgedFocus GroupsHumansIndependent Living

Identifiers

PMID40417539

PMCPMC12099368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.