Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40417526›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2024

Exploring the Utilization of Synthetic Data in Unsupervised Clustering for Opioid Misuse Analysis.

Yili Zhang, Jia Li Dong, Bai Xue, Yanbao Xiong, Samir Gupta, Maarten Van Segbroeck, Nawar Shara, Peter McGarvey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yili ZhangInnovation Center for Biomedical Informatics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Jia Li DongInnovation Center for Biomedical Informatics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Bai XueDepartment of Computer Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Yanbao XiongMedStar Center for Biostatistics, Informatics, and Data Science, MedStar Health, Washington, DC.
Samir GuptaInnovation Center for Biomedical Informatics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Maarten Van SegbroeckGretel Labs Inc., San Diego, CA.
Nawar SharaMedStar Center for Biostatistics, Informatics, and Data Science, MedStar Health, Washington, DC.
Peter McGarveyInnovation Center for Biomedical Informatics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Privacy and security restrictions on medical data pose challenges to collaborative research, making synthetic data an increasingly attractive solution. Recent advancements in Generative AI technologies, like GAN models, have improved synthetic data generation. This study investigates the use of synthetic data in clustering models for opioid misuse analysis, generating a dataset that replicates real-world data from 2017 to 2019, including demographics and diagnosis codes. By maintaining patient privacy, we enable comprehensive analysis without compromising security. We developed unsupervised clustering models to identify opioid misuse patterns and assessed the effectiveness of synthetic data across four scenarios: training on real dataset and testing on real dataset (TRTR), training on real dataset and testing on synthetic dataset (TRTS), TSTR, and TSTS. Results demonstrate that synthetic data can replicate real data distributions and clustering characteristics as a training set, offering significant potential for collaborative model development and optimization without exposing privacy or security risks.

Indexed as

Opioid-Related DisordersCluster AnalysisComputer SecurityHumans

Identifiers

PMID40417526
PMCPMC12099348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.