ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2024
Artificial Intelligence-assisted Biomedical Literature Knowledge Synthesis to Support Decision-making in Precision Oncology.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The role of AI-assisted drug repurposing in neurological disorders: a systematic review of validation strategies, challenges and opportunities.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Pooled it
- Identifying Biomedical Entities for Datasets in Scientific Articles: 4-Step Cache-Augmented Generation Approach Using GPT-4o and PubTator 3.0.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The delivery of effective targeted therapies requires comprehensive analyses of the molecular profiling of tumors and matching with clinical phenotypes in the context of existing knowledge described in biomedical literature, registries, and knowledge bases. We evaluated the performance of natural language processing (NLP) approaches in supporting knowledge retrieval and synthesis from the biomedical literature. We tested PubTator 3.0, Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT), and Large Language Models (LLMs) and evaluated their ability to support named entity recognition (NER) and relation extraction (RE) from biomedical texts. PubTator 3.0 and the BioBERT model performed best in the NER task (best F1-score 0.93 and 0.89, respectively), while BioBERT outperformed all other solutions in the RE task (best F1-score 0.79) and a specific use case it was applied to by recognizing nearly all entity mentions and most of the relations. Our findings support the use of AI-assisted approaches in facilitating precision oncology decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40417512PMC12099343What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.