Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40417508›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2024

Where do doctors disagree? Characterizing Decision Points for Safe Reinforcement Learning in Choosing Vasopressor Treatment.

Esther Brown, Shivam Raval, Alex Rojas, Jiayu Yao, Sonali Parbhoo, Leo A Celi, Siddharth Swaroop, Weiwei Pan, Finale Doshi-Velez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Esther BrownHarvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Shivam RavalHarvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Alex RojasHarvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Jiayu YaoHarvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Sonali ParbhooHarvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Leo A CeliMassachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA.
Siddharth SwaroopHarvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Weiwei PanHarvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Finale Doshi-VelezHarvard University, Cambridge, MA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In clinical settings, domain experts sometimes disagree on optimal treatment actions. These "decision points" must be comprehensively characterized, as they offer opportunities for Artificial Intelligence (AI) to provide statistically informed recommendations. To address this, we introduce a pipeline to investigate "decision regions", clusters of decision points, by training classifiers for prediction and applying clustering techniques to the classifier's embedding space. Our methodology includes: a robustness analysis confirming the topological stability of decision regions across diverse design parameters; an empirical study using the MIMIC-III database, focusing on the binary decision to administer vasopressors to hypotensive patients in the ICU; and an expert-validated summary of the decision regions' statistical attributes with novel clinical interpretations. We demonstrate that the topology of these decision regions remains stable across various design choices, reinforcing the reliability of our findings and generalizability of our approach. We encourage future work to extend this approach to other medical datasets.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceClinical Decision-MakingVasoconstrictor AgentsHumansVasoconstrictor Agents

Identifiers

PMID40417508
PMCPMC12099420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.