ArticleJournal of patient experience2025
Factors Associated With Patient Experience From 2 Tertiary Care Hospitals-A Cross-Sectional Study From Karachi, Pakistan.
Article in Journal of patient experience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Healthcare systems are rapidly transitioning toward patient-centered models, however, there is limited data regarding this from low- and medium-income countries. This cross-sectional study included patients above 18 years, admitted to internal medicine services at 2 tertiary care hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan. The outcome was a patient experience, with independent factors including sociodemographic characteristics (age group, gender, education level, and financial status) and hospital stay-related factors (admission type, length of hospital stay, attending physician's academic designation, functional status, code status, number of consults, and number of surgical and radiological procedures). Among 499 patients, the mean (standard deviation) patient experience score was 44.1 (4.5). Multivariable regression analysis showed higher scores (>45) were associated with factors such as, >16 years of education (OR = 1.6, 95% CI, 0.7-3.9), higher physician academic rank (OR = 4.5, 95% CI, 2.0-9.8 for Associate Professors and OR 12.1, 95% CI, 6.6-22.1) more radiological investigations (OR = 1.3, 95% CI, 0.3-1.8) and undergoing surgical procedures (OR = 2.1, 95% CI, 0.8-5.8). Lower scores (<45) were associated with semiprivate ward admissions, patients with a functional level of II, and a higher number of consults. Overall, the study showed a good patient experience score. However, disparities exist, emphasizing the need for policies to improve patient awareness, physician training, and equitable care for all of those with functional limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.