ArticleJournal of patient experience2025
Digital Disparities in Healthcare: A Tale of the Haves and Have-Nots?
Article in Journal of patient experience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers to Digital Health Utilization and Equity Among a Community Cohort of Adults with HIV in New York City.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- Advancing health equity in proactive health management: from data underrepresentation and algorithmic bias to a closed-loop governance framework.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Improving Outcomes for Black Adults with Diabetes: The Power of Peer Support in the Multidisciplinary Care Team.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While the digitalization of healthcare and the advent of consumer-centered technologies have led to advancements in patient engagement, it is evident that certain, underprivileged segments of society might not be benefiting. The purpose of this review was to thus analyze the expanding data focusing on digital disparities in healthcare and was designed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. First, a literature search of original, peer-reviewed publications was undertaken to identify studies pertaining to disparities in the utilization of digital technologies in healthcare using a variety of customized retrieval terms. Articles published from January 2014 to January 2024 were included. Subsequently, a total of 247 peer-reviewed studies were identified which were used to construct a framework for interpretation. The core themes could broadly be categorized into digital health portals (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.