Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40417453›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2025

Putting the WHO Global Patient Safety Action Plan into Practice: Establishing the Austrian Patient Council as a Best Practice Example of Patient Involvement.

Anna Teufel, Elisabeth Klager, Hannah Hausegger, Christiane Grill, Benjamin Schuster, Maria Kletecka-Pulker, Eva Schaden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna TeufelLudwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6850-6532
Elisabeth KlagerLudwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft, Vienna, Austria.
Hannah HauseggerLudwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft, Vienna, Austria.
Christiane GrillOpen Innovation in Science Center, Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft, Vienna, Austria.
Benjamin SchusterLudwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3480-7803
Maria Kletecka-PulkerLudwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Eva SchadenLudwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Including the patient perspective in health research is not merely beneficial but essential. The establishment of the Austrian Patient Council serves as a practical example of how this goal can be effectively realized. This comprehensive mixed methods study offers valuable insights into the preparatory, foundational, and evaluative steps involved in setting up such a council. By analyzing online surveys conducted at two different points in time and conducting qualitative interviews, the study highlights the critical factors contributing to the council's success. These include selecting research topics of genuine interest to council members; establishing a robust project and administrative structure; ensuring the council is of an appropriate size; and that its membership is diverse and heterogeneous. The study also underscores the importance of implementing measures to facilitate and support active participation, and the need for continuous feedback and flexibility. Overall, the findings demonstrate that patient involvement in health research is feasible and provides a roadmap for meaningful engagement.

Indexed as

health researchinvolvementparticipationpublic health

Identifiers

PMID40417453
PMCPMC12098174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.