ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2025
A Survey of the Perceived Needs of Pediatric Dentists for Esthetic Full Coronal Restoration Options Using Dental Technology.
Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative evaluation of gingival health and parental satisfaction of primary molars restored with two different full-coverage crowns: A split-mouth study.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the perceived need for more esthetic options, the practicality of using newer technologies, and the barriers faced in implementing new technologies among pediatric dentists in the Southwest region of the US. Methods: A 23-question de-identified survey was sent to members of the Southwest Society of Pediatric Dentists in their quarterly newsletter (generated through a QR code) Results: The survey revealed a moderate to significant need among dental practitioners for more esthetic and durable restorative options in pediatric dentistry, particularly for permanent teeth and special needs patients. There was a notable lack of current CAD/CAM technology usage, which is attributed to barriers such as cost and knowledge gaps. A high demand for esthetic solutions from parents was noted, although less importance was placed on custom restorations for primary teeth. The findings also indicated that demographic factors, such as age and years of experience, significantly influence the perceived necessity for new restorative options and the adoption of new technologies, with a trend toward greater interest in esthetics among female practitioners and those with longer practice experience. Conclusion: The results indicate an increasing demand for alternative esthetic and durable restorative options in pediatric dentistry, particularly for permanent teeth and special needs populations. However, the limited familiarity and knowledge concerning CAD/CAM technology among pediatric dentists suggest that further education and research are necessary to bridge this gap. How to cite this article: Ciesla DA, Sardana D, Ahlert I,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.