ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2025
Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Release/Uptake and Physical Properties of Self-adhesive GC Gold Label Hybrid and Antibiotic-modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An
Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Scientific research continues to make progress in identifying the best practices for treating and preventing dental caries. The quest to search for an ideal restorative material has been a challenge for researchers and academicians in the fraternity of restorative dentistry. Materials and methods: A total of 90 restorative specimens were prepared and divided into two groups comprising 45 samples each: gold label hybrid (group I) and antibiotic-modified glass ionomer cement (GIC) (group II). Each group was further subdivided into three groups of 15 samples each for the evaluation of compressive strength, setting time, and fluoride release, respectively. GC label hybrid was designated as group I, and an antibiotic mixture consisting of ciprofloxacin and metronidazole (1:1) was added at 1% concentration to conventional GIC (Fuji II), which served as group II. The compressive strength was evaluated using a universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. The setting time was measured using Vicat's apparatus. Fluoride release was evaluated using an ion-selective electrode. The data were statistically analyzed. Results: The results showed a Conclusion: It can be concluded that antibiotic-modified GIC showed the best How to cite this article: Done V, Battu S, Prasad MG,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.