Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40417408›Full record

ArticleBurns & trauma2025

Primary repair of proximal anterior cruciate ligament injury: a global expert consensus statement.

Shurong Zhang, Tian Xia, Xuesong Dai, Gregory S DiFelice, Lars Engebretsen, Alberto Gobbi, Christiaan H Heusdens, Gordon M MacKay, Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet, Jelle P van der List and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Burns & trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Knee proprioception following anterior cruciate ligament repair and reconstruction: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Shurong ZhangDepartment of Sports Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, No 12, Wulumuqi Zhong Road, Shanghai, China.
Tian XiaDepartment of Sports Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, No 12, Wulumuqi Zhong Road, Shanghai, China.
Xuesong DaiSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, No 88, Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Gregory S DiFeliceOrthopaedic Trauma Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY 10021, United States.
Lars EngebretsenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo 3143244, Norway.
Alberto GobbiO.A.S.I. Bioresearch Foundation Gobbi N.P.O, Via Amadeo GA 24, I-20133, Milan, Italy.
Christiaan H HeusdensDepartment of Orthopaedics, Antwerp University Hospital and ASTARC, University of Antwerp, Antwerp 2803138, Edegem, Belgium.
Gordon M MacKayStirling University, Stirling 2636910, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Bertrand Sonnery-CottetCentre orthopédique Santy, FIFA medical Center of excellence, hôpital Mermoz, groupe Ramsay, 24 Ave Paul Santy, F-69008 Lyon, France.
Jelle P van der ListDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
Shu-Hang P YungDepartment of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Jianquan WangDepartment of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Yinghui HuaDepartment of Sports Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, No 12, Wulumuqi Zhong Road, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0247-7852

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of primary repair for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries remains controversial, and evidence-based guidelines have not yet been established. Remarkable advancements in arthroscopic techniques and biological stimuli have been achieved in the past decades, which may change expectations regarding the potential of ACL healing and clinical outcomes for patients. In this study, a global expert consensus on the primary repair of proximal ACL injuries was established. A panel of 16 experts from the fields of sports medicine and arthroscopic surgery was invited to participate in the compilation of this consensus statement. This project followed the Delphi approach to the consensus process involving steering, rating, and peer review groups. Ultimately, 14 statements were retained: four achieved unanimous support, six achieved strong consensus, and four did not achieve consensus. The expert consensus statement established in this study focused on surgical indications, decision-making, surgical techniques, adjunctive methods, prognostic factors, and rehabilitation following ACL repair. The accepted recommendations in these areas will assist doctors and therapists in standardizing the management of related pathologies. The consensus statement clearly states that the tear site and tissue quality are important for ensuring successful ACL repair, while other factors should also be considered. ACL reconstruction remains the gold standard for ACL repair until long-term follow-up data demonstrates otherwise.

Indexed as

Anterior cruciate ligamentExpert consensusPrimary repair

Identifiers

PMID40417408
PMCPMC12102069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.