ArticleSAGE open nursing
Determining How Nurses Living With Their Families Decide to Work in a COVID-19 Intensive Care Unit: Grounded Theory Study.
Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Previous studies have shown that, during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, nurses were being reassigned to non-COVID-19 wards, opting to take leave, or resigning because of concerns of infecting their families. Even so, many nurses decided to continue working. However, a literature review revealed a lack of research clarifying how nurses coped with their anxiety and came to the decision to work in a COVID-19 intensive care unit. Objective: To determine the process by which nurses living with their families decided to work in an intensive care unit during the COVID-19 pandemic and the factors that influenced their decision. Methods: Fifteen registered nurses who lived with their families and decided to work in a COVID-19 intensive care unit during the pandemic were recruited for an individual, semi-structured interview. Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory was used to analyze the transcripts. Results: Four core categories were identified. When the nurses perceived their facility would accept a patient with COVID-19, they: (1) assessed the risk of infection to their family, (2) weighed their anxiety against their sense of mission, (3) reduced the risk of infection, and (4) discussed the decision with their family members. Conclusion: The decision involved fear of infecting families, trust in the hospital, and sense of mission. Hospitals' consideration of the situation was important in motivating employees and reducing anxiety. There was a gender bias in this study. The large number of male participants resulted from the characteristics of the participating COVID-19 intensive care units, reflecting gender roles in Japan, where men often work and women are responsible for housework and childcare. Facilities and managers should foster a workplace culture that values employees, even in ordinary times. Our findings may help healthcare organizations support nurses in an emerging infectious disease pandemic and ensure nurses are available in healthcare systems with limited resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.