ArticleBrain communications2025
Evidence that minocycline treatment confounds the interpretation of neurofilament as a biomarker.
Article in Brain communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Biofluid Markers for Huntington's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025Pooled it
- Biomarkers in ALS trials: from discovery to clinical utility.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Pooled it
- Skeletal Muscle Biomarkers of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Large-Scale, Multi-Cohort Proteomic Study.Annals of neurology · 2026Article
- Review
- Rethinking phase 2 trials in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Drug repurposing in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).Expert opinion on drug discovery · 2025Review
- Comprehensive cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons of plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein and neurofilament light across FTD spectrum disorders.Molecular neurodegeneration · 2025Article
- Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis caused by hexanucleotide repeat expansions in C9orf72: from genetics to therapeutics.The Lancet. Neurology · 2025Review
- Navigating the Alzheimer's Biomarker Landscape: A Comprehensive Analysis of Fluid-Based Diagnostics.Cells · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neurofilament light (NfL) concentration in CSF and blood serves as an important biomarker in neurology drug development. Changes in NfL are generally assumed to reflect changes in neuronal damage, while little is known about the clearance of NfL from biofluids. In a study of asymptomatic individuals at risk for prion disease, both blood and CSF NfL spiked in one participant following a 6-week course of minocycline, absent any other biomarker changes and without subsequent onset of symptoms. We subsequently observed high NfL after minocycline treatment in discarded clinical plasma samples from inpatients, in mouse plasma and in conditioned media from neuron-microglia co-cultures. The specificity and kinetics of NfL response lead us to hypothesize that minocycline does not cause or exacerbate neuronal damage, but instead affects NfL by inhibiting its clearance, posing a potential confounder for the interpretation of this important biomarker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.