Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40417230›Full record

ReviewExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2025

Multi-stakeholder perspective on community pharmacy services in Saudi Arabia: A systematic review and meta-analyses for 2010-2020.

Khalid S Alghamdi, Max Petzold, Mahdi H Alsugoor, Hafiz A Makeen, Christina Ljungberg Persson, Laith Hussain-Alkhateeb

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Availability, utilization, and factors associated with professional pharmacy services in community pharmacies in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Khalid S AlghamdiSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Box 469, 40530 Göteborg, Sweden.
Max PetzoldSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Box 469, 40530 Göteborg, Sweden.
Mahdi H AlsugoorDepartment of Emergency Medical Services, Faculty of Health Sciences, Al-Qunfudah, Umm Al-Qura University, 21912 Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Hafiz A MakeenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jazan University, 6809 Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Christina Ljungberg PerssonSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Box 469, 40530 Göteborg, Sweden.
Laith Hussain-AlkhateebSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Box 469, 40530 Göteborg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Community pharmacists are the third-largest group of healthcare professionals globally; their capacity often extends far beyond dispensing medication, and they are increasingly involved in a diverse range of advanced health service delivery, which can potentially improve public health outcomes. Among the many initiatives of the Saudi national transformation program towards Saudi Vision 2030 are plans to transform the current model of community pharmacy services by expanding their role to include patient-centered healthcare provision. Objectives: This systematic literature review (2010-2020) of the multi-stakeholder perspective aimed to evaluate services provided by Saudi community pharmacies and satisfaction levels, investigate perceived factors associated with the practice, and identify barriers affecting services. Materials and methods: Seven scientific electronic databases were searched. The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. This review was subjected to descriptive analyses, meta-analyses of proportion, and narrative synthesis. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool version 2018 was used to assess the quality of studies. Results: Minimal physician participation, community pharmacies' owners and managers, and gender imbalance among pharmacists all arose as gaps in Saudi Arabia. The findings showed that community pharmacies enable self-medication, with one-third of antibiotics being dispensed without prescriptions despite the threat of law enforcement. The deficiency of patient counseling by community pharmacists threatens patient safety, and the lack of knowledge about clinical services diminishes opportunities for adequate practice. Conclusion: Several factors contributing to this inadequate performance and low satisfaction levels were reported. The findings were alarming and highlighted the need to intensify efforts towards Saudi Vision 2030, which aims to improve the overall population health and healthcare system in Saudi Arabia. Our review suggests that more efforts are needed to integrate key commercial, administrative, and technical sectors associated with the processes of community pharmacy dispensing and counseling.

Indexed as

BarriersCommunity pharmacyPharmacy practiceSaudi ArabiaServices

Identifiers

PMID40417230
PMCPMC12099458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.