ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
An ethnopharmacological survey of herbal medicines use among pregnant and postpartum women in Souss Massa (Morocco).
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pregnant women use medicinal plants for the treatment of illnesses associated with pregnancy. Women might resort to using medicinal plants because they are easily accessible and inexpensive. This study aims to determine the prevalence, to document and to analyse the traditional use of medicinal plants during pregnancy. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among pregnant and postpartum women attending the Obstetrics and Gynecology Service at the regional hospital center, Hassan II of Souss Massa region. An Ethnopharmacological survey was used for data collection. After collection, data were coded, entered, and analyzed by Jamovi Software. Results: A total of 420 women participated in this study. The mean age was 28.7 ± 6.35. The prevalence of herbal medicine consumption among pregnant and postpartum women is 48% with CI 95% (43.2%-52.7%). 35 varieties of medicinal plants from 22 families were used during pregnancy. Each of the other families had one species. Plant extracts were primarily prepared through decoction, infusion, maceration, Fumigation, extraction, and powder. The oral route was the most common route of administration used, about the number of plates used by pregnant and postpartum women (90.9%). Conclusion: The utilization of herbal medicine among pregnant mothers in this study was high in the region of Souss Massa. This research expands our understanding of the role that different plant species have in the management of disorders that affect women during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.