ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2025
Machine Learning Based Early Diagnosis of ADHD with SHAP Value Interpretation: A Retrospective Observational Study.
Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term exposure to polystyrene microplastics exacerbates seizure symptoms via lipid metabolic disruption and ferroptosis: insights from multi-omics analyses.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- An explainable machine learning-based approach to predicting treatment response for neurofeedback in ADHD.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predicting ADHD in Children and Adolescents With Artificial Intelligence: A Scoping Review of Common Models.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Machine learning-guided feature selection and predictive model construction for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a common neurodevelopmental disorder in children, characterized by inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. Current diagnostic methods for ADHD rely primarily on behavioral assessments, which can be challenging due to symptom overlap with other psychiatric disorders and significant inter-individual variability. Developing potential early diagnostic methods for ADHD is imperative to mitigate the risk of misdiagnosis and enhance the evaluation of treatment efficacy. Methods: The study was conducted at the Department of Pediatrics, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, from November 2022 to January 2024. Clinical data, including complete blood count, liver and kidney function tests, blood glucose levels, serum electrolyte tests, and serum 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 levels, were collected. Feature selection and model construction were performed using various machine learning algorithms. Results: Our results indicated that the Gradient Boosting Machine algorithm is the optimal model. Conclusion: Our machine learning analyses suggest that the Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) model may be the optimal choice, highlighting blood beta-2 microglobulin levels, red blood cell distribution width, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, and the percentage of eosinophils as key predictors of ADHD risk, thereby aiding early diagnosis. Further large-scale studies are warranted to validate these findings and explore the underlying mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.