Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40417110›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025

Migraine triggers, phases, and classification using machine learning models.

Anusha Reddy, Ajit Reddy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anusha ReddySan Juan Bautista School of Medicine, Caguas, Puerto Rico, United States.
Ajit ReddyIndependent Researcher, Monmouth County, NJ, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In many countries, patients with headache disorders such as migraine remain under-recognized and under-diagnosed. Patients affected by these disorders are often unaware of the seriousness of their conditions, as headaches are neither fatal nor contagious. In many cases, patients with migraine are often misdiagnosed as regular headaches. Methods: In this article, we present a study on migraine, covering known triggers, different phases, classification of migraine into different types based on clinical studies, and the use of various machine learning algorithms such as logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and artificial neural network (ANN) to learn and classify different migraine types. This study will only consider using these methods for diagnostic purposes. Models based on these algorithms are then trained using the dataset, which includes a compilation of the types of migraine experienced by various patients. These models are then used to classify the types of migraines, and the results are analyzed. Results: The results of the machine learning models trained on the dataset are verified for their performance. The results are further evaluated by selective sampling and tuning, and improved performance is observed. The precision and accuracy obtained by the support vector machine and artificial neural network are 91% compared to logistic regression (90%) and random forest (87%). These models are run with the dataset without optimal tuning across the entire dataset for different migraine types; which is further improved with selective sampling and optimal tuning. These results indicate that the discussed models are relatively good and can be used with high precision and accuracy for diagnosing different types of migraine. Conclusion: Our study presents a realistic assessment of promising models that are dependable in aiding physicians. The study shows the performance of various models based on the classification metrics computed for each model. It is evident from the results that the artificial neural network (ANN) performs better, irrespective of the sampling techniques used. With these machine learning models, types of migraines can be classified with high accuracy and reliability, enabling physicians to make timely clinical diagnoses of patients.

Indexed as

logistic regressionmigraine phasesmigraine triggersmigraine typesneural networksrandom forestsupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID40417110
PMCPMC12101124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.