ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Migraine triggers, phases, and classification using machine learning models.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- 'Man vs. Machine: can ML algorithms diagnose headaches as accurately as clinicians? A systematic review.'Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In many countries, patients with headache disorders such as migraine remain under-recognized and under-diagnosed. Patients affected by these disorders are often unaware of the seriousness of their conditions, as headaches are neither fatal nor contagious. In many cases, patients with migraine are often misdiagnosed as regular headaches. Methods: In this article, we present a study on migraine, covering known triggers, different phases, classification of migraine into different types based on clinical studies, and the use of various machine learning algorithms such as logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and artificial neural network (ANN) to learn and classify different migraine types. This study will only consider using these methods for diagnostic purposes. Models based on these algorithms are then trained using the dataset, which includes a compilation of the types of migraine experienced by various patients. These models are then used to classify the types of migraines, and the results are analyzed. Results: The results of the machine learning models trained on the dataset are verified for their performance. The results are further evaluated by selective sampling and tuning, and improved performance is observed. The precision and accuracy obtained by the support vector machine and artificial neural network are 91% compared to logistic regression (90%) and random forest (87%). These models are run with the dataset without optimal tuning across the entire dataset for different migraine types; which is further improved with selective sampling and optimal tuning. These results indicate that the discussed models are relatively good and can be used with high precision and accuracy for diagnosing different types of migraine. Conclusion: Our study presents a realistic assessment of promising models that are dependable in aiding physicians. The study shows the performance of various models based on the classification metrics computed for each model. It is evident from the results that the artificial neural network (ANN) performs better, irrespective of the sampling techniques used. With these machine learning models, types of migraines can be classified with high accuracy and reliability, enabling physicians to make timely clinical diagnoses of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.