ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Protective and risk factors of social support for healthcare workers in high-pressure occupational settings.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A survey on social support during standardized training for pediatric residents in Southwest China: a preliminary study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Self-Harm Among Health Care Workers: Protocol for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Social support is a critical factor in maintaining the mental health of healthcare workers in high-pressure occupational settings. However, few studies have systematically explored the different types of social support and their influencing factors. This study aims to investigate the current status of social support for healthcare workers under high pressure, along with the related protective and risk factors. Methods: This cross-sectional study collected data through an online questionnaire involving 625 doctors and nurses from the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. The Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS) was used to assess levels of social support, including objective support, subjective support, and support utilization. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS 26.0, employing univariate and linear regression analyses to examine gender differences and the impact of various factors on social support. Results: The study found that the total social support score was increased by factors such as family cohesion, living with others, older age, and professional identity (with doctors achieving higher scores than nurses), while insecure attachment and being an only child reduced the total social support score. Conclusion: This study reveals the multidimensional impact of various factors on social support for healthcare workers in high-pressure occupational settings. These findings provide a basis for promoting individual mental health and also highlights the need to pay more attention to the mental health of those healthcare workers with poor interpersonal relationships, younger individuals, and nurses in high-pressure environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.