ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025
Effect of IPACK-Adductor Canal Block Combination on Adolescent Pain Management After Hamstring Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Outcomes of Ultrasound-Guided IPACK Block for Posterior Knee Pain in Advanced Osteoarthritis: A Multicenter Prospective Single-Arm Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Changes in Opioid Prescription Patterns Following Implementation of the Controlled Substance Utilization Review and Evaluation System.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is no pain management standard for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) or one that addresses posterior capsule pain from hamstring autograft collection. IPACK (Infiltration of local anesthetic between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee) is a novel peripheral nerve block designed as an analgesic for the posterior capsule. IPACK use has been beneficial in decreasing reported pain and medications needed for adult total knee arthroplasty; thus, it may be helpful for ACLR. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that adding IPACK to the adductor canal block (ACB) would decrease pain levels and opioids provided for adolescents who undergo ACLR with hamstring autografts as compared with local infiltration analgesia (LIA) or ACB only. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted for 153 adolescent patients, aged 10 to 18 years, who underwent ACLR with hamstring autografts at a single hospital over 17 months. The type of regional block was determined by the surgeon's preference, and patients received LIA only, ACB only, or IPACK + ACB. They were compared across these groups to identify the efficacy of each analgesic. Results: Patients across the entire cohort received a mean of 31.6 ± 12.9 morphine milligram equivalents (MME); the MME did not differ significantly based on regional blocks of LIA only, ACB only, and IPACK + ACB ( Conclusion: Overall, the amount of MME used at this institution was relatively low; however, the use of IPACK + ACB did not decrease opioid usage or pain levels after ACLR as compared with LIA or ACB only for the adolescent population. Use of any regional block was not superior to LIA for MME or reported pain levels. Given that IPACK + ACB did not decrease MME, it is not recommended to add an IPACK block for ACLR in adolescent patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.