Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40416993›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025

Measuring Posterior Tibial Slope: A Comparison Using a 10-cm Anatomic Axis Versus 15-cm Anatomic Axis.

Collin D R Hunter, Reece M Rosenthal, Devin L Froerer, Hansel E Ihn, Ameen Z Khalil, Joseph Featherall, Justin J Ernat, Travis G Maak, Stephen K Aoki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Collin D R HunterDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Reece M RosenthalDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Devin L FroererDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Hansel E IhnDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Ameen Z KhalilDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Joseph FeatherallDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Justin J ErnatDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Travis G MaakDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5023-2657
Stephen K AokiDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6940-9865

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate measurement of posterior tibial slope (PTS) is for understanding knee biomechanics and stability, as well as in planning surgical procedures. The validated methodology for measuring PTS requires outline visualization of 15 cm distal to the proximal tibia, a cutoff that is not always met on standard lateral knee radiographs. Purpose/Hypothesis: The goal of this study was to critically evaluate whether using a 10-cm anatomic axis on conventional lateral knee radiographs is comparable with the established 15-cm standard. The authors hypothesized that a shortened 10-cm anatomic axis would yield comparable results to the conventional 15-cm method. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Lateral knee radiographs were reviewed until a cohort of 100 patients was identified where ≥15 cm of the tibial shaft distal to the joint line could be measured. PTS was calculated using both the conventional 15-cm proximal anatomic axis (15-PTS) and the proposed modified 10-cm axis (10-mPTS). Measurement reliability and agreement were quantitatively assessed via intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman analysis, respectively. Paired Results: There was a statistically significant congruence between the 10-mPTS and 15-PTS techniques (ICC, 0.92; Conclusion: The 10-mPTS method exhibits <1° of deviation compared with the conventional 15-PTS approach, establishing it as a practical and reliable alternative for assessing PTS on lateral knee radiographs, particularly when visualization of 15 cm distally is not possible.

Indexed as

knee anatomic axislateral knee radiographposterior tibial slopetibial shaft visibility

Identifiers

PMID40416993
PMCPMC12099164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.