Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40416992›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025

Comparison of Outcomes Between a Fixed-Loop Cortical Suspensory Device and Metal Interference Screw for Femoral Fixation of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Grafts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Scandinavian Registry Study.

Alexander Nagel Tandberg, Marek Zegzdryn, Cathrine Aga, Stein Hakon Lastad Lygre, Tone Gifstad, Jon Olav Drogset, Lars Engebretsen, Martin Lind, Magnus Forssblad, Stig Heir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alexander Nagel TandbergDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Akershus, Norway.
Marek ZegzdrynDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Sørlandet Hospital, Arendal, Aust-Agder, Norway.
Cathrine AgaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Martina Hansens Hospital, Bærum, Norway.
Stein Hakon Lastad LygreDepartment of Occupational Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Hordaland, Norway.
Tone GifstadOrthopaedic Surgery, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Trøndelag, Norway.
Jon Olav DrogsetOrthopaedic Surgery, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Trøndelag, Norway.
Lars EngebretsenOslo Sport Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2294-921X
Martin LindDepartment of Orthopaedics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Magnus ForssbladDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Stockholm Sports Trauma Research Center, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stig HeirDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Martina Hansens Hospital, Bærum, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Use of a cortical suspensory device (CSD) is an alternative fixation method for bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) in the femur. To the authors' knowledge, no study has compared revision outcomes and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with the traditional interference screw (IS) fixation. Purpose: To compare the survival rate of grafts fixated on the femoral side with either a fixed-loop CSD or IS for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACLRs) with BPTB autograft 2 and 5 years after index surgery, as well as to compare PROs between the same 2 treatment groups based on data from 3 National Knee Ligament Registers (NKLRs) in Scandinavia. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: The study included patients registered in the NKLRs of Norway, Denmark, and Sweden who underwent primary ACLR from 2005 to 2021. Patients undergoing additional surgery for concomitant injuries to the posterior cruciate ligament, lateral collateral ligament, or medial collateral ligament and patients with major cartilage lesions were excluded. Cox regression models with and without adjustment for possible confounding from age, sex, meniscal and chondral injury, tibial fixation, surgical time, time from injury to surgery, injury mechanism, and country were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals. The possible effects of femoral fixation on 1-year postoperative KOOS QoL and on change from preoperative to 1-year postoperative KOOS QoL were analyzed using multiple linear regression with adjustment from possible confounding from the same variables. Results: A total of 13,955 primary ACLRs met the inclusion criteria during the study period; 1852 patients (13%) had a femoral CSD fixation and 12,103 patients (87%) a femoral IS fixation. No significant difference was observed in overall risk of revision between CSD and IS (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.47; Conclusion: Data from the Scandinavian NKLRs showed no difference in the risk of revision and no difference in the KOOS QoL for fixed-loop CSD fixation compared with IS fixation on the femoral side with BPTB grafts in primary ACL reconstruction.

Indexed as

ACLBPTBcortical fixationinterference screw fixation

Identifiers

PMID40416992
PMCPMC12099111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.