Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40416966›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025

Cancer in connective tissue disease.

Antonio Tonutti, Angela Ceribelli, Elisa Gremese, Serena Colafrancesco, Maria De Santis, Carlo Selmi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Antonio TonuttiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Angela CeribelliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Elisa GremeseDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Serena ColafrancescoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Maria De SantisDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Carlo SelmiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The association between cancer and autoimmunity is well-recognized, as represented by the increased incidence of cancer among patients with systemic autoimmune diseases; however, the underlying mechanisms remain only partially understood. On the one hand, malignancy may trigger a breakdown of immune tolerance in predisposed individuals, as autoimmune syndromes often emerge shortly after cancer diagnosis, suggesting that tumor antigens might initiate an autoimmune response. However, by involving persistent responses and the creation of a pro-inflammatory environment, the chronic immune activation characteristic of autoimmunity may promote oncogenesis. This scenario is further complicated by the use of immunosuppressive therapies for autoimmune conditions, which, as seen in transplant immunology, are associated with a higher risk of cancer, although data in rheumatology have not yielded definitive conclusions. Connective tissue diseases include systemic lupus erythematosus, primary Sjögren syndrome, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, systemic sclerosis, mixed connective tissue disease, and undifferentiated forms. These conditions have been variably associated with an increased risk of cancer, both at the time of disease onset and in patients with long-standing autoimmune conditions, providing a paradigm for investigating this complex interplay. Despite recent progress, many unmet needs remain that warrant further research.

Indexed as

Connective Tissue DiseasesNeoplasmsAnimalsAutoimmune DiseasesAutoimmunityHumansautoantibodiesautoimmunityconnective tissue disease (CTD)immunologymalignancy

Identifiers

PMID40416966
PMCPMC12098390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.