ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Surgical resection of malignant tumors at the ischial tuberosity: a new surgical incision design and clinical experience.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Dangerous Region Generation Method for Computer-Assisted Pelvic Bone Tumor Resection Surgery: A Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to present the anatomical characteristics of a novel surgical incision designed for single ischiectomy and to share our practical experience with its application. Methods and materials: The newly developed surgical incision begins 5-6 cm below the posterior superior iliac spine and extends toward the ipsilateral greater trochanter, passing through the ischial tuberosity. It is then continued distally along the femur via the greater trochanter, forming what is referred to as a PIG-S incision. This study outlines the surgical resection procedures in two patients diagnosed with ischiotuberous chondrosarcoma who underwent surgery using the PIG-S incision. Key outcomes include surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications. Results: In one case, the patient experienced tumor recurrence nine months after an initial curettage of the ischial tubercle, necessitating complete tumor resection via the PIG-S approach. The second patient presented with ischiotuberous chondrosarcoma involving the lower margin of the acetabulum. A combined surgical approach using a PIG-S incision and an anterior ilioinguinal incision was adopted for tumor resection in regions II and III, with pelvic reconstruction performed using a 3D-printed prosthesis. The surgeries lasted for the two patients 90 and 150 min, with intraoperative blood losses of 1000 and 2000 mL, respectively. No postoperative incision-related complications were observed in either patient. Conclusions: The PIG-S incision allows comprehensive exposure of crucial structures within the sciatic region, facilitates complete resection of the ischial tuberosity, and maximally preserves the sciatic nerve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.