ArticleACS environmental Au2025
Evaluating Powdered Activated Carbon for Adsorption of Nitrogenous Organics in Water Using HDPairFinder.
Article in ACS environmental Au, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amino-containing compounds are key precursors to highly toxic nitrogenous disinfection byproducts (DBPs) and odorous DBPs, posing a critical challenge for drinking water utilities. This study systematically evaluated the adsorption performance of six commercial powdered activated carbons (PACs) for removing soluble amino-containing compounds using amino acids as model compounds. Among them, PHF and AN PAC demonstrated superior removal efficiencies for six tested amino acids, ranging from 77 to 98% for PHF PAC and 83 to 96% for AN PAC. Subsequent analysis focused on PHF, AN, and HB PACs to investigate adsorption kinetics and effects of water parameters, including initial amino acid concentration, pH, and natural organic matter (NOM) on removal efficiencies. Optimal removal efficiencies were observed for PHF and AN PACs at pH levels between 6 and 8, while increased NOM levels significantly reduced amino acid adsorption. Finally, a hydrogen/deuterium isotopic labeling-based nontargeted analysis was applied to evaluate the removal of amino-containing compounds from source water (represented by Suwannee River standard reference materials). PHF exhibited the highest removal efficiency, achieving a 47% reduction in the total ion chromatogram (TIC) intensity of labeled amino-containing features, followed by AN at 21% and HB at 19%. The decrease in the TIC intensity and number of labeled amino-containing features aligned with the trends observed in adsorption, establishes a consistent ranking of PHF > AN > HB PAC. PAC can be seamlessly integrated into existing drinking water treatment processes and applied on an as-needed basis. Our results could provide valuable guidance for its effective application in water treatment plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.