ArticleACS environmental Au2025
Characterization of Inorganic Additives in and Photochemically Liberated from Consumer Plastics: Implications for Global and Local Biogeochemical Cycles.
Article in ACS environmental Au, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reprocessable Vitrimers From Post-Consumer Polyolefin Blends: Elucidating Phase-Selective Dynamic Networks.Macromolecular rapid communications · 2026Article
- Biodegradation of poly (butylene adipate-co-terephthalate)/poly (lactic acid) under food waste composting: COBiodegradation · 2026Article
- Investigating Plastic-Metal Interactions in Aquatic Environments Using Laser Ablation ICP-MS and Chemical Markers.ACS ES&T water · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The composition and environmental impacts of inorganic additives in consumer plastics have received little attention within the plastic pollution discipline relative to organic additives. In this work, X-ray florescence spectroscopy, loss-on-ignition, and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry were used to qualitatively and quantitatively characterize inorganic additives from up to 80 consumer plastic items. On average, consumer plastic goods contained ∼8% inorganic additives by mass. Concentrations of each element often varied by orders of magnitude. The most common elements detected were from the alkali metal, alkaline earth metal, and first-row transition metal groups, with Ca, Ti, and Al being most abundant. The diversity and abundance of inorganic additives was notably higher in consumer-grade plastics than in standard plastics routinely used to assess the fate and impacts of plastic pollution. Sunlight exposure readily liberated most elements from consumer plastics, typically in the <10 and <1 μm fractions. However, the relative percent of photochemical liberation varied considerably across element and plastic articles, suggesting that formulation is a key control of their liberation from consumer plastics. Compared to average upper continental crust concentrations, Sb and Zn were most enriched, with median enrichment factors of 2 and 1 orders of magnitude, respectfully. Mass balance calculations indicate that plastic pollution may represent a substantial proportion of natural riverine elemental fluxes, particularly for Sb and Zn, which could reach ∼13% and ∼4% of the global natural riverine fluxes by 2060, respectively. Localized impacts in many small, highly polluted rivers could be even larger. However, such impacts are highly dependent on the riverine plastic loading rate to the ocean. Overall, these findings highlight the need for increased consideration of inorganic additives when assessing the fate and impacts of consumer plastics leaking into the environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.