ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2025
Predicting Postoperative Blood Transfusion in Elderly Patients Undergoing Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Using Machine Learning Models.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk prediction models for blood transfusion in patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Review of the influence of anaemia on the effect of total hip arthroplasty, and the prognosis of patients: recent advances and future directions.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Clinical risk factors for multidrug-resistant organism infections in postoperative gastric cancer patients: an ICU-based retrospective analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Early ambulation within 24 h after joint arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- AI-Driven Innovations in Transfusion Medicine: A Narrative Synthesis of Current Reviews.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Intraoperative Blood Transfusion in Partial Hip Arthroplasty.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: With the aging population, the demand for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has risen significantly. Elderly patients, especially those over 70 years, face a higher risk of perioperative bleeding and transfusion, increasing morbidity and mortality. Accurate transfusion risk prediction is vital for optimizing perioperative blood management. Traditional models often fail to capture complex factor interactions, whereas machine learning enhances predictive accuracy. This study aimed to develop predictive models for postoperative transfusion in elderly patients undergoing THA or TKA, identify key risk factors, and create an online prediction tool. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 1,520 elderly patients who underwent THA (659) or TKA (861). The Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) method was used for variable selection. The dataset was randomly split into training (70%) and testing (30%) sets. Five models-Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Naive Bayes (NB)-were developed and validated. Ten-fold cross-validation and grid search optimized model parameters. Model performance was evaluated using AUC, accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were applied to assess variable importance. An online tool was developed based on the models. Results: Nineteen variables were retained. RF, LR, and SVM showed superior performance with AUC values exceeding 0.90. RF achieved the best results, with an accuracy of 0.86, precision of 0.80, specificity of 0.91, F1-score of 0.78, and sensitivity of 0.76. SHAP analysis highlighted intraoperative blood loss, hypertension, and postoperative drainage volume as major predictors. Conclusion: The developed models and online tool support personalized transfusion risk assessment, optimizing perioperative management, optimizing blood utilization, and enhancing patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.