Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40416787›Full record

ArticleApplied network science2025

Temporal dynamics of the friendship paradox in a smartphone communication network.

Cheng Wang, Omar Lizardo, David S Hachen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied network science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cheng WangDepartment of Sociology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI USA.
Omar LizardoDepartment of Sociology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA.
David S HachenDepartment of Sociology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The friendship paradox, initially discussed by Scott Feld in 1991, highlights a counterintuitive social phenomenon where individuals tend to have fewer friends than their friends do on average. The sociological implications of this paradox are profound, as it can create a distorted understanding of social norms and consequently influence beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors, particularly when highly connected individuals present a skewed representation of those norms. In essence, it can lead individuals to misjudge what is typical or desirable within their social circles. This study investigates the temporal dynamics of the friendship paradox using smartphone communication data from over 600 incoming freshmen at the University of Notre Dame participating in the NetHealth project. By tracking the friendship index- the ratio of an individual's friends' average number of friends to their own number of friends- over 119 days during the Fall semester of 2015, we examine how the paradox evolves over time. Our findings reveal that the friendship index stabilizes more rapidly than both the individuals' own degree and the variation among their friends' degrees. Results from the latent growth-curve model (LGCM) confirm that while the friendship index continues to increase, its growth rate declines over time. Moreover, the LGCM identifies individual degrees, ethnic backgrounds, and personality traits as influential factors shaping the manifestation and development of the friendship paradox. By exploring the mechanisms underlying this paradox in a dynamic communication network, this study enhances our understanding of the structural factors influencing the evolution of the friendship paradox in digitally mediated interactions. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41109-025-00710-1.

Indexed as

Friendship indexFriendship paradoxLatent growth-curve model (LGCM)NetHealth projectTemporal dynamics

Identifiers

PMID40416787
PMCPMC12102006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.