Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40416744›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2025

Oropharyngeal dysphagia management and informed consent: a survey of speech-language pathologists' practice patterns when recommending modified texture diets.

Matthew G Ward, Angela S Bowman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matthew G WardSA Swallowing Services, Nashville, TN, United States.
Angela S BowmanDepartment of Health and Human Performance, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The modification of diet textures and liquid viscosity represents the primary form of management of oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) by speech-language pathologists (SLPs). Despite the ubiquitous use of modified texture diets (MTDs) to prevent aspiration in an attempt to prevent pneumonia, there is no convincing evidence that consumption of MTDs protects individuals with dysphagia from developing pneumonia. Furthermore, informed consent is required for the prescription of MTDs. To date, no study has investigated if practicing SLPs know the risks associated with MTDs, consider the risks when making clinical decisions, and disclose those risks to their patients. Method: Thirteen negative health outcomes associated with MTDs were identified in the research literature. A web-based survey was created and distributed. Participants were asked to identify known risks associated with MTDs, how often they considered the risks associated with MTDs before recommending them, and how often they informed patients with OD of the known risks associated with MTDs. Results: Only 6.3% of the SLPs surveyed identified all thirteen listed health risks associated with MTDs, and greater than one in five respondents ( Conclusions: Participants demonstrated poor overall knowledge of the hazards associated with MTDs, limited consideration of known risks of MTDs, and suboptimal levels of disclosure of the risks associated with MTDs to patients with OD.

Indexed as

dysphagiainformed consentmodified dietspeech-language pathologistthickened liquids

Identifiers

PMID40416744
PMCPMC12098351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.