ArticleJournal of inflammation research2025
Machine Learning-Based Mortality Risk Prediction Model in Patients with Sepsis.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prediction models for mortality in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Application of a machine learning model integrating T cell subsets and clinical markers in 28-Day mortality prediction of sepsis patients.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Infectious Diseases in Older Adults: Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Applications.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- A Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO)-derived AAGC Model for In-hospital Mortality Prediction in Sepsis Incorporating Age, APACHE II Score, Glasgow Coma Scale, and Creatinine: A Prospective Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care MedicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of our study was to establish and validate a machine learning-based predictive model for mortality risk in elderly patients with sepsis. By integrating traditional biomarkers, novel biomarkers, clinical data, and established scoring systems, the model seeks to enhance predictive accuracy and thereby improve clinical outcomes in high-risk patient population. Methods: Conducted at Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital from August 2021 to August 2023, our study included 180 emergency department patients meeting Sepsis 3.0 diagnostic criteria. Data collected included patient demographics, vital signs, laboratory parameters, disease-related scores, major comorbidities, and the 28-day mortality. Variables were analyzed using univariate analysis and LASSO regression, and the machine learning model was constructed using R statistical software and validated internally via bootstrap resampling and calibration curves. Results: The model identified seven significant variables: SOFA, APACHE II, MAP, ALB, PCT, LTB, and VEGF. These variables constituted our final prediction model, which achieved an AUC of 0.845 (95% CI: 0.786, 0.905), with a sensitivity of 75.9% and a specificity of 85.0%. Internal validation yielded a bootstrap-corrected AUC of 0.857 (95% CI: 0.799, 0.912), confirming the model's statistical robustness. The nomogram provided a visual tool for predicting 28-day mortality risk, and decision curve analysis demonstrated strong potential for clinical utility. Conclusion: The predictive model, which incorporates SOFA, APACHE II, MAP, ALB, PCT, LTB, and VEGF, shows significant potential in predicting the 28-day mortality risk for elderly sepsis patients. It provides a convenient and rapid tool for clinical use. Further research with larger sample sizes and external validation is warranted to confirm these findings and enhance the model's applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.