ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Prevalence and epidemiology of
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence ofInfectious disease reports · 2026Article
- Clinical Manifestations and Associated Disease States withOpen forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at four antenatal care facilities in Nchelenge, Zambia, among 1,021 pregnant women. Vaginal swabs were collected and tested using the Aptima Results: The prevalence of MG was 12.6% (127 of 1,005 valid samples) among the pregnant women. Only 12 MG-positive women (9.4%) had symptoms of a genitourinary infection, which was similar to the frequency of genitourinary symptoms among MG-negative women (6.1%). The rates of Discussion: This study emphasizes the high prevalence of MG among pregnant women in Zambia, but also lack of MRAMs in MG. These findings suggest that azithromycin remains an efficacious treatment option for MG in this population. Nevertheless, continuous surveillance and judicious macrolide use to maintain treatment efficacy are imperative. Further research and sustained monitoring of MG are essential to inform public health strategies and clinical guidelines in Zambia and similar settings worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.